↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between Stress and Vestibular Compensation – A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions between Stress and Vestibular Compensation – A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yougan Saman, D. E. Bamiou, Michael Gleeson, Mayank B. Dutia

Abstract

Elevated levels of stress and anxiety often accompany vestibular dysfunction, while conversely complaints of dizziness and loss of balance are common in patients with panic and other anxiety disorders. The interactions between stress and vestibular function have been investigated both in animal models and in clinical studies. Evidence from animal studies indicates that vestibular symptoms are effective in activating the stress axis, and that the acute stress response is important in promoting compensatory synaptic and neuronal plasticity in the vestibular system and cerebellum. The role of stress in human vestibular disorders is complex, and definitive evidence is lacking. This article reviews the evidence from animal and clinical studies with a focus on the effects of stress on the central vestibular pathways and their role in the pathogenesis and management of human vestibular disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Psychology 11 8%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,466,655
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#516
of 13,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,976
of 252,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#8
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.