The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subjective Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Depends on Task Length
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2014.00214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Sandry, Helen M. Genova, Ekaterina Dobryakova, John DeLuca, Glenn Wylie |
| Abstract |
The objective of this paper is to investigate the interrelationship between subjective and objective cognitive fatigue, information processing domain [processing speed (PS) vs. working memory (WM)], cognitive load (high vs. low), and time on task in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#653,342
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#227
of 14,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,905
of 267,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#4
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.