↓ Skip to main content

Movement Recognition Technology as a Method of Assessing Spontaneous General Movements in High Risk Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Movement Recognition Technology as a Method of Assessing Spontaneous General Movements in High Risk Infants
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Marcroft, Aftab Khan, Nicholas D. Embleton, Michael Trenell, Thomas Plötz

Abstract

Preterm birth is associated with increased risks of neurological and motor impairments such as cerebral palsy. The risks are highest in those born at the lowest gestations. Early identification of those most at risk is challenging meaning that a critical window of opportunity to improve outcomes through therapy-based interventions may be missed. Clinically, the assessment of spontaneous general movements is an important tool, which can be used for the prediction of movement impairments in high risk infants. Movement recognition aims to capture and analyze relevant limb movements through computerized approaches focusing on continuous, objective, and quantitative assessment. Different methods of recording and analyzing infant movements have recently been explored in high risk infants. These range from camera-based solutions to body-worn miniaturized movement sensors used to record continuous time-series data that represent the dynamics of limb movements. Various machine learning methods have been developed and applied to the analysis of the recorded movement data. This analysis has focused on the detection and classification of atypical spontaneous general movements. This article aims to identify recent translational studies using movement recognition technology as a method of assessing movement in high risk infants. The application of this technology within pediatric practice represents a growing area of inter-disciplinary collaboration, which may lead to a greater understanding of the development of the nervous system in infants at high risk of motor impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Engineering 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Neuroscience 18 9%
Computer Science 16 8%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 52 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,388,295
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,698
of 11,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,378
of 352,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#62
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.