↓ Skip to main content

Microvesicles: What is the Role in Multiple Sclerosis?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microvesicles: What is the Role in Multiple Sclerosis?
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2015.00111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiziana Carandini, Federico Colombo, Annamaria Finardi, Giacomo Casella, Livia Garzetti, Claudia Verderio, Roberto Furlan

Abstract

Microvesicles are a recently described way of cell communication that has been implicated in a number of biological processes, including neuroinflammation. Widely investigated as biomarkers in oncology and neurological disorders, little is known of the role of microvesicles in the pathogenesis of diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Several evidences suggest that pro-inflammatory microglia and infiltrating macrophages release microvesicles that spread inflammatory signals and alter neuronal functions. We review here available information on microvesicles, with a special focus on microglia and macrophage microvesicles, in the pathogenesis of MS, and as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 28%
Neuroscience 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,315
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,706
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,997
of 266,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#74
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.