↓ Skip to main content

White Matter Correlates of Auditory Comprehension Outcomes in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
White Matter Correlates of Auditory Comprehension Outcomes in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shihui Xing, Elizabeth H. Lacey, Laura M. Skipper-Kallal, Jinsheng Zeng, Peter E. Turkeltaub

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have shown that speech comprehension involves a number of widely distributed regions within the frontal and temporal lobes. We aimed to examine the differential contributions of white matter connectivity to auditory word and sentence comprehension in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Structural and diffusion MRI data were acquired on 40 patients with chronic post-stroke aphasia. A battery of auditory word and sentence comprehension tests were administered to all the patients. Tract-based spatial statistics were used to identify areas in which white matter integrity related to specific comprehension deficits. Relevant tracts were reconstructed using probabilistic tractography in healthy older participants, and the mean values of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) of the entire tracts were examined in relation to comprehension scores. Anterior temporal white matter integrity loss and involvement of the uncinate fasciculus related to word-level comprehension deficits (RFA = 0.408, P = 0.012; RMD = -0.429, P = 0.008; RAD = -0.424, P = 0.009; RRD = -0.439, P = 0.007). Posterior temporal white matter integrity loss and involvement of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus related to sentence-level comprehension deficits (RFA = 0.382, P = 0.02; RMD = -0.461, P = 0.004; RAD = -0.457, P = 0.004; RRD = -0.453, P = 0.005). Loss of white matter integrity in the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus related to both word- and sentence-level comprehension (word-level scores: RFA = 0.41, P = 0.012; RMD = -0.447, P = 0.006; RAD = -0.489, P = 0.002; RRD = -0.432, P = 0.008; sentence-level scores: RFA = 0.409, P = 0.012; RMD = -0.413, P = 0.011; RAD = -0.408, P = 0.012; RRD = -0.413, P = 0.011). Lesion overlap, but not white matter integrity, in the arcuate fasciculus related to sentence-level comprehension deficits. These findings suggest that word-level comprehension outcomes in chronic post-stroke aphasia rely primarily on anterior temporal lobe pathways, whereas sentence-level comprehension relies on more widespread pathways including the posterior temporal lobe.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 24%
Psychology 5 12%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Linguistics 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,538,272
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,812
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,153
of 311,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#92
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.