↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Juxtacortical Small Lesions: A Neuroimaging Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Juxtacortical Small Lesions: A Neuroimaging Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yilong Shan, Sha Tan, Yuge Wang, Kui Li, Lei Zhang, Siyuan Liao, Li Zhou, Zhezhi Deng, Xueqiang Hu, Haiyan Li, Xuejiao Men, Bingjun Zhang, Lisheng Peng, Zhuang Kang, Yan Zou, Zhengqi Lu

Abstract

White matter hyperintensities can be easily identified by brain imaging. Juxtacortical small lesion (JCSL) is a special type of white matter lesion, defined as no greater than 5 mm in diameter and adjacent to the cerebral cortex in location. We notice lately that JCSLs alone may be associated to various neurological symptoms. Here, we design the present study to determine the risk factors for JCSLs and their clinical manifestations in patients in our neurology clinic. 206 participants suffered from neurological disorders and completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were divided into two groups: patients with JCSLs and patients without lesions on MRI. Meanwhile, 129 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were also recruited. Laboratory examinations and the phenotypes and distributions of the symptoms of the three groups were compared. The serum levels of apoB and homocysteine (HCY) were independently related to the appearance of JCSLs and HCY level was also associated with the number of JCSLs. Patients with JCSLs might present with headache, insomnia, and/or anxiety/depression, which were related with the anatomical locations of the lesions. These data suggest that JCSLs are symptomatic and might in result fromarteriole atherosclerosis, which should raise our attention.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,448,386
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,924
of 11,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,358
of 318,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#151
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.