↓ Skip to main content

Hyperacute Simultaneous Cardiocerebral Infarction: Rescuing the Brain or the Heart First?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperacute Simultaneous Cardiocerebral Infarction: Rescuing the Brain or the Heart First?
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naruchorn Kijpaisalratana, Aurauma Chutinet, Nijasri C. Suwanwela

Abstract

Concurrent acute ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction is an uncommon medical emergency condition. The challenge for the physicians regarding the management of this situation is paramount since early management of one condition will inevitably delay the other. We present two illustrative cases of "hyperacute simultaneous cardiocerebral infarction" who presented with simultaneous cardiocerebral infarction and arrived at the hospital within the thrombolytic therapeutic window for acute ischemic stroke of 4.5 h. We propose an algorithm for managing the patient with hyperacute simultaneous cardiocerebral infarction based on hemodynamic status and suggest close cardiac monitoring based on the site of cerebral infarction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 47%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,060,270
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,026
of 11,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,221
of 440,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#40
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.