↓ Skip to main content

A Perspective on Wearable Sensor Measurements and Data Science for Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Perspective on Wearable Sensor Measurements and Data Science for Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Matias, Vitor Paixão, Raquel Bouça, Joaquim J. Ferreira

Abstract

Miniaturized and wearable sensor-based measurements enable the assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD) motor-related features like never before and hold great promise as non-invasive biomarkers for early and accurate diagnosis, and monitoring the progression of PD. High-fidelity human movement reconstruction and simulation can already be conducted in a clinical setting with increasingly precise and affordable motion technology enabling access to high-quality labeled data on patients' subcomponents of movement (kinematics and kinetics). At the same time, body-worn sensors now allow us to extend some quantitative movement-related measurements to patients' daily living activities. This era of patient movement "cognification" is bringing us previously inaccessible variables that encode patients' movement, and that, together with measures from clinical examinations, poses new challenges in data analysis. We present herein examples of the application of an unsupervised methodology to classify movement behavior in healthy individuals and patients with PD where no specific knowledge on the type of behaviors recorded is needed. We are most certainly leaving the early stage of the exponential curve that describes the current technological evolution and soon will be entering its steep ascent. But there is already a benefit to be derived from current motion technology and sophisticated data science methods to objectively measure parkinsonian impairments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Neuroscience 15 11%
Computer Science 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 43 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,099,825
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,191
of 11,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,426
of 439,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#21
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.