↓ Skip to main content

Parkinson’s Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies Have Similar Neuropsychological Profiles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parkinson’s Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies Have Similar Neuropsychological Profiles
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgina M. Aldridge, Allison Birnschein, Natalie L. Denburg, Nandakumar S. Narayanan

Abstract

Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are common causes of dementia worldwide. Although considered separate entities based on the relative temporal onset of motor symptoms vs. diagnosis of dementia, it is unknown if these diseases truly have distinct cognitive profiles. We hypothesized that patients divided into PDD and DLB categories strictly by temporal criteria would have different neuropsychological profiles. We investigated this question via neuropsychological testing of PDD and DLB patients at the University of Iowa. We performed retrospective chart analysis and review of neuropsychological testing of clinically diagnosed patients with PDD or DLB, who had presented to University of Iowa's dementia and movement disorder clinics. Forty-seven patients diagnosed by the treating neurologist as PDD or DLB were included. Neuropsychological performance was compared between groups, and as a function of the relative timing of the motor diagnosis vs. diagnosis of dementia. We found that both PDD and DLB patients showed severe deficits in executive function, visual-spatial processing, and verbal learning. However, we found no significant differences in neuropsychological performance between groups, and neuropsychological performance could not reliably account for the relative timing of motor diagnosis vs. diagnosis of dementia. Our data support the idea that DLB and PDD are on a neuropsychological spectrum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Psychology 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,071,136
of 23,646,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,422
of 12,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,556
of 333,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#50
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,646,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.