↓ Skip to main content

Shortlasting, Unilateral, Neuralgiform, Headache Attacks with Conjunctival Injection, Tearing, Sweating and Rhinorrhea: The Term and New View Points

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shortlasting, Unilateral, Neuralgiform, Headache Attacks with Conjunctival Injection, Tearing, Sweating and Rhinorrhea: The Term and New View Points
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Antonaci, Torbjørn Fredriksen, Juan A. Pareja, Ottar Sjaastad

Abstract

A solitary patient with symptoms similar to those of shortlasting unilateral neuralgiform conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) was first mentioned in 1978. The term SUNCT was first used in 1991. SUNCT is an acronym; the "S" signifies "Shortlasting"; the "U" symbolizes "Unilateral"; "N" stands for "Neuralgiform"; the "C" for "Conjunctival injection"; and "T" for "Tearing." The term short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms were marketed in 2004. The terminology and new view points are discussed and nosography proposal for SUNCT is presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,356,560
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,091
of 11,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,915
of 326,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#118
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.