↓ Skip to main content

Intermittent Hypoxia Is Associated With High Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α but Not High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Cell Expression in Tumors of Cutaneous Melanoma Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intermittent Hypoxia Is Associated With High Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α but Not High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Cell Expression in Tumors of Cutaneous Melanoma Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isaac Almendros, Miguel Ángel Martínez-García, Francisco Campos-Rodríguez, Erica Riveiro-Falkenbach, José L. Rodríguez-Peralto, Eduardo Nagore, Antonio Martorell-Calatayud, Luis Hernández Blasco, Jose Bañuls Roca, Eusebi Chiner Vives, Alicia Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Jorge Abad-Capa, Josep Maria Montserrat, Amalia Pérez-Gil, Valentín Cabriada-Nuño, Irene Cano-Pumarega, Jaime Corral-Peñafiel, Trinidad Diaz-Cambriles, Olga Mediano, Joan Dalmau-Arias, Ramon Farré, David Gozal, On Behalf of the Spanish Sleep Network, Elidia Molina Herrera, Rosa M. García Martín, Maria Niveiro de Jaime, Sara Moreno, Ferran Barbé Ilia, Manuel Sánchez de la Torre, Esther de Eusebio, Pedro Landete, Manuel Moragón Gordon, Eva Arias, Fernando Masa, Carlos González Herrada, Cristina Carrera, Aida Muñoz Ferrer, Aram Boada, Ana Fortuna, Mercé Mayos, Jesús Gardeazabal García

Abstract

Epidemiological associations linking between obstructive sleep apnea and poorer solid malignant tumor outcomes have recently emerged. Putative pathways proposed to explain that these associations have included enhanced hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) cell expression in the tumor and altered immune functions via intermittent hypoxia (IH). Here, we examined relationships between HIF-1α and VEGF expression and nocturnal IH in cutaneous melanoma (CM) tumor samples. Prospectively recruited patients with CM tumor samples were included and underwent overnight polygraphy. General clinical features, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), desaturation index (DI4%), and CM characteristics were recorded. Histochemical assessments of VEGF and HIF-1α were performed, and the percentage of positive cells (0, <25, 25-50, 51-75, >75%) was blindly tabulated for VEGF expression, and as 0, 0-5.9, 6.0-10.0, >10.0% for HIF-1α expression, respectively. Cases with HIF-1α expression >6% (high expression) were compared with those <6%, and VEGF expression >75% of cells was compared with those with <75%. 376 patients were included. High expression of VEGF and HIF-1α were seen in 88.8 and 4.2% of samples, respectively. High expression of VEGF was only associated with increasing age. However, high expression of HIF-1α was significantly associated with age, Breslow index, AHI, and DI4%. Logistic regression showed that DI4% [OR 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06)] and Breslow index [OR 1.28 (95% CI: 1.18-1.46)], but not AHI, remained independently associated with the presence of high HIF-1α expression. Thus, IH emerges as an independent risk factor for higher HIF-1α expression in CM tumors and is inferentially linked to worse clinical CM prognostic indicators.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#12,781,496
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,767
of 11,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,017
of 326,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#108
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.