↓ Skip to main content

Traumatic Brain Injury and Firearm Use and Risk of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Among Veterans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traumatic Brain Injury and Firearm Use and Risk of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Among Veterans
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen D. Kelley, Harvey Checkoway, Deborah A. Hall, Stephen G. Reich, Chris Cunningham, Irene Litvan

Abstract

Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a tauopathy that has a multifactorial etiology. Numerous studies that have investigated lead exposure and traumatic brain injury (TBI) as risk factors for other tauopathies, such as Alzheimer's disease, but not for PSP. Objective: We sought to investigate the role of firearm usage, as a possible indicator of lead exposure, and TBI as risk factors for PSP in a population of military veterans. Methods: We included participants from a larger case-control study who reported previous military service. Our sample included 67 PSP cases and 68 controls. Participants were administered a questionnaire to characterize firearm use in the military and occurrence of TBI. Results: Cases were significantly less educated than controls. In unadjusted analyses, the proportion of PSP cases (80.6%) and controls (64.7%) who reported use of firearms as part of their military job was positively associated with PSP, odds ratio (OR) 2.2 (95% CI: 1-5.0). There were no significant case-control differences in mean service duration. There was only a weak association with history of TBI, OR 1.6 (95% CI: 0.8-3.4). In multivariate models, firearm usage (OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.5, 9.8) remained significantly associated with PSP. Conclusions: Our findings show a positive association between firearm usage and PSP and an inverse association between education and PSP. The former suggests a possible etiologic role of lead. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential etiologic effects of metals on PSP. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00431301.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,701,759
of 23,859,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,556
of 12,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,854
of 331,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#181
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,859,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.