↓ Skip to main content

The Clinical and Radiological Spectrum of Hippocampal Pathology in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Clinical and Radiological Spectrum of Hippocampal Pathology in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Foteini Christidi, Efstratios Karavasilis, Georgios Velonakis, Panagiotis Ferentinos, Michail Rentzos, Nikolaos Kelekis, Ioannis Evdokimidis, Peter Bede

Abstract

Hippocampal pathology in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) remains surprisingly under recognized despite compelling evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging and neuropathology studies. Hippocampal dysfunction contributes significantly to the clinical heterogeneity of ALS and requires structure-specific cognitive and neuroimaging tools for accurate in vivo evaluation. Recent imaging studies have generated unprecedented insights into the presymptomatic and longitudinal processes affecting this structure and have contributed to the characterisation of both focal and network-level changes. Emerging neuropsychology data suggest that memory deficits in ALS may be independent from executive dysfunction. In the era of precision medicine, where the development of individualized care strategies and patient stratification for clinical trials are key priorities, the comprehensive review of hippocampal dysfunction in ALS is particularly timely.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,115,271
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,198
of 12,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,133
of 327,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#36
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.