↓ Skip to main content

Novel Variants Identified in Multiple Sclerosis Patients From Southern China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel Variants Identified in Multiple Sclerosis Patients From Southern China
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongxuan Wang, Lakhansing Arun Pardeshi, Xiaoming Rong, Enqin Li, Koon Ho Wong, Ying Peng, Ren-He Xu

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune and demyelinating disease. Genome-wide association studies have shown that MS is associated with many genetic variants in some human leucocyte antigen genes and other immune-related genes, however, those studies were mostly specific to Caucasian populations. We attempt to address whether the same associations are also true for Asian populations by conducting whole-exome sequencing on MS patients from southern China. Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood mononucleocytes of 8 MS patients and 26 healthy controls and followed by exome sequencing. Results: In total, 41,227 variants were found to have moderate to high impact on their protein products. After filtering per allele frequencies according to known database, 17 variants with the allele frequency <1% or variants with undetermined frequency were identified to be unreported and have significantly different frequencies between the MS patients and healthy controls. After validation via Sanger sequencing, one rare variant located in exon 7 of TRIOBP (Chr22: 37723520G>T, Ala322Ser, rs201693690) was found to be a novel missense variant. Conclusion: MS in southern China may have association with unique genetic variants, our data suggest TRIOBP as a potential novel risk gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,985,001
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,197
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,699
of 330,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#175
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.