↓ Skip to main content

Altered Regional Cortical Brain Activity in Healthy Subjects After Sleep Deprivation: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered Regional Cortical Brain Activity in Healthy Subjects After Sleep Deprivation: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00588
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingling Chen, Xueliang Qi, Jiyong Zheng

Abstract

Objective: To investigate acute sleep deprivation (SD)-related regional brain activity changes and their relationships with behavioral performances. Methods: Twenty-two female subjects underwent an MRI scan and an attention network test at rested wakefulness (RW) status and after 24 h SD. The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) was used to investigate SD-related regional brain activity changes. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the ability of the ALFF differences in regional brain areas to distinguish the SD status from the RW status. We used Pearson correlations to evaluate the relationships between the ALFF differences in brain areas and the behavioral performances during the SD status. Results: Subjects at the SD status exhibited a lower accuracy rate and a longer reaction time relative to the RW status. Compared with RW, SD showed significant lower ALFF values in the right cerebellum anterior lobe, and higher ALFF areas in the bilateral inferior occipital gyrus, left thalamus, left insula, and bilateral postcentral gyrus. The area under the curve values of the specific ALFF differences in brain areas were (mean ± std, 0.851 ± 0.045; 0.805-0.93). Further, the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the ALFF differences in those regional brain areas alone discriminated the SD status from the RW status with high degrees of sensitivities (82.16 ± 7.61%; 75-93.8%) and specificities (81.23 ± 11.39%; 62.5-93.7%). The accuracy rate showed negative correlations with the left inferior occipital gyrus, left thalamus, and left postcentral gyrus, and showed a positive correlation with the right cerebellum. Conclusions: The ALFF analysis is a potential indicator for detecting the excitation-inhibition imbalance of regional cortical activations disturbed by acute SD with high performances.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 16%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,986,372
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,201
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,005
of 331,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#175
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.