↓ Skip to main content

Structural Brain Network Alteration and its Correlation With Structural Impairments in Patients With Depression in de novo and Drug-Naïve Parkinson's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Brain Network Alteration and its Correlation With Structural Impairments in Patients With Depression in de novo and Drug-Naïve Parkinson's Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lubin Gou, Wei Zhang, Chuanming Li, Xinlin Shi, Zhiming Zhou, Weijia Zhong, Ting Chen, Xiajia Wu, Chun Yang, Dajing Guo

Abstract

Purpose: Depression is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and is correlated with the severity of motor deficits and quality of life. The present study aimed to investigate alterations in the structural brain network related to depression in Parkinson's disease (d-PD) and their correlations with structural impairments of white matter (WM). Materials and Methods: Data were acquired from the Parkinson Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database. A total of 84 de novo and drug-naïve PD patients were screened and classified into two groups according to the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15): d-PD (n = 28) and nondepression in PD (nd-PD, n = 56). Additionally, 37 healthy controls (HC) were screened. All subjects underwent DTI and 3D-T1WI on a 3.0 T MR scanner. Individual structural brain networks were constructed and analyses were performed using graph theory and network-based statistics (NBS) at both global and local levels. Differences in global topological properties were explored among the three groups. The association models between node and edge changes and the GDS-15 were constructed to detect regions that were specifically correlated with d-PD. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) was used to detect structural impairments of WM between the d-PD and nd-PD groups. The correlations between altered global topological properties and structural impairments were analyzed in the d-PD group. Results: The global efficiency and characteristic path length of the structural brain network were impaired in the d-PD group compared with those in the nd-PD and HC groups. Thirteen nodes and 1 subnetwork with 10 nodes and 12 edges specifically correlated with d-PD were detected. The left hippocampus, left parahippocampal, left lingual, left middle occipital, left inferior occipital, left fusiform, left middle temporal, and left inferior temporal regions were all involved in the results of node and edge analysis. No WM microstructural impairments were identified in the d-PD group. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the integration of the structural brain network is impaired with disrupted connectivity of limbic system and visual system in the de novo and drug-naïve d-PD patients.The topological properties assessing integration of the structural brain network can serve as a potential objective neuroimaging marker for early diagnosis of d-PD.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,028
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,682
of 330,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#240
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.