↓ Skip to main content

Novel TBC1D24 Mutations in a Case of Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel TBC1D24 Mutations in a Case of Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingjing Li, Ruihong Liu, Huiyu Feng, Jian Zhang, Dilong Wang, Yiming Wang, Jinsheng Zeng, Yuhua Fan

Abstract

Objective: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is an uncommon clinical manifestation in patients with TBC1D24 mutations. In addition, NCSE has not been reported as a syndrome together with cerebellar ataxia and ophthalmoplegia. Methods: We herein report the clinical and genetic features of a four-year-old patient with NCSE, cerebellar ataxia, and ophthalmoplegia caused by hitherto unidentified TBC1D24 mutations. We performed 24-h video electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging, and gene sequencing on the patient and her parents to determine the diagnosis. Results: We identified a novel c.1416_1437del (p.Ser473Argfs*43) mutation, as well as the previously identified c.1499C>T (p.Ala500Val) mutation in TBC1D24, by using targeted next-generation sequencing. The novel mutation (inherited from the mother) is the first reported deletion mutation longer than 20 bp in TBC1D24. The p.Ala500Val mutation inherited from father has been reported in a German patient with infantile myoclonic, for whom results from the EEG and neuroimaging were normal. These two mutations resulted in the severe phenotypes observed in our patient Conclusions: The identification of the novel TBC1D24 mutation and consequent complicated clinical manifestations suggest that patients with NCSE and ataxia demand more attention. We further recommend that genetic test should be administered to these patients to avoid genetic inheritance of this mutation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Psychology 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,028
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,839
of 329,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#241
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.