Introduction: Intracerebral structures and pathologies such as intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) can be displayed sufficiently by transcranial sonography (TCS). In some patients with ICH clot evacuation via surgery or catheter drainage to reduce secondary parenchymal injuries may be necessary. We hypothesized that bedside-placement of drainage-catheters, which is a minimal invasive evacuation-technique complicated by a higher rate of catheter misplacement can be optimized via TCS. Methods: Eleven consecutive ICH-patients diagnosed via computertomography (CT) were included in this prospective observational pilot study. All patients were examined via TCS, firstly in order to illustrate the hematoma, secondly to optimize catheter placement. Catheter placement was primarily validated via CT. Results: The TCS-depiction of ICH-extension was optimal in 10 patients; one patient showed a partially insufficient transtemporal bone window. Catheter positioning could be traced and adapted correctly via TCS-examination in all patients. Follow-up CT-scans confirmed TCS-description of catheter-positioning in all patients without any complications. Reduction of symptoms and ICH-volumes confirmed effectiveness of treatment. Conclusions: The illustration of ICH and the drainage-placement is possible via TCS in a cost- and time-efficient way.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,980
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,028
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,657
of 330,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#237
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
