You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elucidating the Interactive Roles of Glia in Alzheimer's Disease Using Established and Newly Developed Experimental Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2018.00797 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heejung Chun, Ian Marriott, C. Justin Lee, Hansang Cho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 27 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,158,741
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,243
of 12,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,062
of 342,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#35
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.