The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Electromyography (EMG) Techniques for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Motor Impairment Following Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2018.01122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cliff S. Klein, Sheng Li, Xiaogang Hu, Xiaoyan Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,031,060
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,741
of 14,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,770
of 446,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#107
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.