You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of Different Device Interactions in a Virtual Reality Task in Individuals With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy—A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00024 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruna Leal de Freitas, Talita Dias da Silva, Tânia Brusque Crocetta, Thais Massetti, Luciano Vieira de Araújo, Shelly Coe, Helen Dawes, Fatima Aparecida Caromano, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Researcher | 4 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 42 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,669,944
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,765
of 14,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,945
of 449,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#49
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.