↓ Skip to main content

Impact of the McDonald Criteria 2017 on Early Diagnosis of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of the McDonald Criteria 2017 on Early Diagnosis of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Schwenkenbecher, Ulrich Wurster, Franz Felix Konen, Stefan Gingele, Kurt-Wolfram Sühs, Mike P. Wattjes, Martin Stangel, Thomas Skripuletz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 70 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 24%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 81 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,379,190
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,765
of 12,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,041
of 351,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#197
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.