↓ Skip to main content

ROCK-ALS: Protocol for a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase IIa Trial of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of the Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitor Fasudil in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ROCK-ALS: Protocol for a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase IIa Trial of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of the Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitor Fasudil in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Lingor, Markus Weber, William Camu, Tim Friede, Reinhard Hilgers, Andreas Leha, Christoph Neuwirth, René Günther, Michael Benatar, Magdalena Kuzma-Kozakiewicz, Helen Bidner, Christiane Blankenstein, Roberto Frontini, Albert Ludolph, Jan C. Koch, The ROCK-ALS Investigators, Shahram Attarian, Mathias Bähr, Matthias Boentert, Nathalie Braun, Philippe Corcia, Isabell Cordts, Marcus Deschauer, Thorsten Grehl, Julian Grosskreutz, Andreas Hermann, Josua Kuttler, Teresa Lengenfeldt, Fabian Maass, Thomas Meyer, Susanne Petri, Yvonne Remane, Jens Schmidt, Joachim Schuster, Marie-Hélène Soriani, Jeffrey Statland, Jochen Weishaupt, Daniel Zeller, Eirini Zielke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,040,756
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,228
of 12,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,548
of 351,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#222
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.