↓ Skip to main content

Deep Brain Stimulation Programming 2.0: Future Perspectives for Target Identification and Adaptive Closed Loop Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep Brain Stimulation Programming 2.0: Future Perspectives for Target Identification and Adaptive Closed Loop Stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franz Hell, Carla Palleis, Jan H. Mehrkens, Thomas Koeglsperger, Kai Bötzel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 51 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 47 25%
Engineering 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Computer Science 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,406,002
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,719
of 14,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,848
of 368,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#113
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.