The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual vs. Single Tasking During Circular Walking: What Better Reflects Progression in Parkinson's Disease?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00372 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Encarna Micó-Amigo, Idsart Kingma, Sebastian Heinzel, Susanne Nussbaum, Tanja Heger, Rob C. van Lummel, Daniela Berg, Walter Maetzler, Jaap H. van Dieën |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,254,879
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,493
of 12,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,113
of 351,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#120
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.