The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correlation Between Intracranial Arterial Calcification and Imaging of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00426 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuan-Chang Chen, Xiao-Er Wei, Jing Lu, Rui-Hua Qiao, Xue-Feng Shen, Yue-Hua Li |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 35% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 16% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,618,893
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,903
of 12,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,386
of 350,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#137
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.