The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Home-Based High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients With Lacunar Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00664 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rikke Steen Krawcyk, Anders Vinther, Nicolas Caesar Petersen, Jens Faber, Helle K. Iversen, Thomas Christensen, Kate Lykke Lambertsen, Shazia Rehman, Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen, Egill Rostrup, Christina Kruuse |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 88 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 99 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#20,574,182
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,060
of 12,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,836
of 350,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#250
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.