The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Progressive Modular Rebalancing System and Visual Cueing for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial With Crossover
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariano Serrao, Francesco Pierelli, Elisabetta Sinibaldi, Giorgia Chini, Stefano Filippo Castiglia, Marina Priori, Dario Gimma, Giovanni Sellitto, Alberto Ranavolo, Carmela Conte, Michelangelo Bartolo, Giuseppe Monari |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,998,420
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,090
of 12,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,130
of 340,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#139
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.