You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Freezing of Gait: From Bench to Bedside
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00905 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erich Talamoni Fonoff, Andrea C. de Lima-Pardini, Daniel Boari Coelho, Bernardo Assumpção Monaco, Birajara Machado, Carolina Pinto de Souza, Maria Gabriela dos Santos Ghilardi, Clement Hamani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 24 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,465,644
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,310
of 12,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,992
of 340,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#81
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.