↓ Skip to main content

Follow-Up in Aphasia Caused by Acute Stroke in a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Experimental Controlled Noninvasive Study With an iPad-Based App (Neolexon®): Study Protocol of the Lexi Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follow-Up in Aphasia Caused by Acute Stroke in a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Experimental Controlled Noninvasive Study With an iPad-Based App (Neolexon®): Study Protocol of the Lexi Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.00294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis C. Thunstedt, Peter Young, Clemens Küpper, Katharina Müller, Regina Becker, Franziska Erbert, Katharina Lehner, Marika Rheinwald, Angelika Pfahler, Marianne Dieterich, Lars Kellert, Katharina Feil

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 42 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Linguistics 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 47 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,060,441
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,241
of 12,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,985
of 377,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#309
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.