↓ Skip to main content

Sporadic and Familial Variants in NF1: An Explanation of the Wide Variability in Neurocognitive Phenotype?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sporadic and Familial Variants in NF1: An Explanation of the Wide Variability in Neurocognitive Phenotype?
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2020
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.00368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maëlle Biotteau, Sébastien Déjean, Sandrine Lelong, Stéphanie Iannuzzi, Nathalie Faure-Marie, Pierre Castelnau, François Rivier, Valérie Lauwers-Cancès, Eloïse Baudou, Yves Chaix

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Psychology 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 26 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,722,646
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,965
of 12,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,698
of 381,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#333
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.