The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Air vs. Road Decision for Endovascular Clot Retrieval in a Rural Telestroke Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00628 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shyam Gangadharan, Thomas Lillicrap, Ferdinand Miteff, Pablo Garcia-Bermejo, Thomas Wellings, Billy O'Brien, James Evans, Khaled Alanati, Christopher Levi, Mark W. Parsons, Andrew Bivard, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Neil J. Spratt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 43% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,035,913
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,880
of 12,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,432
of 366,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#435
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.