The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Hiligaynon Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool (MoCA-Hil) Among Patients With X-Linked Dystonia Parkinsonism (XDP)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00947 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicole B. Aliling, Adovich S. Rivera, Roland Dominic G. Jamora |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,273,261
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,503
of 12,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,457
of 399,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#423
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.