The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cerebral Perfusion Effects of Cognitive Training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild-Moderate TBI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.545174 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davin K. Quinn, Joel Upston, Thomas Jones, Emma Brandt, Jacqueline Story-Remer, Violet Fratzke, J. Kevin Wilson, Rebecca Rieger, Michael A. Hunter, Darbi Gill, Jessica D. Richardson, Richard Campbell, Vincent P. Clark, Ronald A. Yeo, Claude William Shuttleworth, Andrew R. Mayer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,748,179
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,605
of 12,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,049
of 414,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#179
of 585 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 585 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.