↓ Skip to main content

Computerized Cognitive Training by Healthy Older and Younger Adults: Age Comparisons of Overall Efficacy and Selective Effects on Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computerized Cognitive Training by Healthy Older and Younger Adults: Age Comparisons of Overall Efficacy and Selective Effects on Cognition
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.564317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole F. Ng, Allen M. Osman, Kelsey R. Kerlan, P. Murali Doraiswamy, Robert J. Schafer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 34 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 33 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,277,941
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#409
of 11,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,777
of 500,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#22
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 500,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.