↓ Skip to main content

Oral Anticoagulation and Risk of Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation in Stroke Patients Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy: Data From the Nordictus Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral Anticoagulation and Risk of Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation in Stroke Patients Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy: Data From the Nordictus Registry
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.594251
Pubmed ID
Authors

María E. Ramos-Araque, Alba Chavarría-Miranda, Beatriz Gómez-Vicente, Elena López-Cancio Martínez, María Castañón Apilánez, Mar Castellanos, María López Fernández, Herbert Tejada Meza, Javier Marta Moreno, Javier Tejada García, Iria Beltrán Rodríguez, Patricia de la Riva, Noemi Díez, Susana Arias Rivas, María Santamaría Cadavid, Yolanda Bravo Anguiano, Mónica Bártulos Iglesias, Enrique Jesús Palacio Portilla, Marian Revilla García, Juan José Timiraos Fernández, Naroa Arenaza Basterrechea, José Luis Maciñeiras Montero, Pablo Vicente Alba, Francisco José Julián Villaverde, Ana Pinedo Brochado, Itxaso Azkune, Freijo M. Mar, Alain Luna, Juan F. Arenillas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,848,895
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,872
of 15,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,599
of 535,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#266
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.