The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Vitamin D on Experimental Autoimmune Neuroinflammation Is Dependent on Haplotypes Comprising Naturally Occurring Allelic Variants of CIITA (Mhc2ta)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.600401 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonja Hochmeister, Shahin Aeinehband, Charles Dorris, Rasmus Berglund, Michaela T. Haindl, Vid Velikic, Sven A. Gustafsson, Tomas Olsson, Fredrik Piehl, Maja Jagodic, Manuel Zeitelhofer, Milena Z. Adzemovic |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,159,327
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,053
of 12,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,412
of 414,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#96
of 624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.