↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive Working Memory Training Can Improve Executive Functioning and Visuo-Spatial Skills in Children With Pre-term Spastic Diplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive Working Memory Training Can Improve Executive Functioning and Visuo-Spatial Skills in Children With Pre-term Spastic Diplegia
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.601148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Chiara Di Lieto, Chiara Pecini, Paola Brovedani, Giuseppina Sgandurra, Marta Dell'Omo, Anna Maria Chilosi, Andrea Guzzetta, Silvia Perazza, Elisa Sicola, Giovanni Cioni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 12%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,731,468
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,382
of 12,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,402
of 503,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#475
of 565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.