The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Telerehabilitation for Word Retrieval Deficits in Bilinguals With Aphasia: Effectiveness and Reliability as Compared to In-person Language Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.589330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Peñaloza, Michael Scimeca, Angelica Gaona, Erin Carpenter, Nishaat Mukadam, Teresa Gray, Shilpa Shamapant, Swathi Kiran |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 22% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,926,987
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,605
of 14,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,652
of 438,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#58
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.