The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Implication of Corrective Saccades in the Video Head Impulse Test for the Diagnosis of Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Infarction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.605040 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gi-Sung Nam, Hyun-June Shin, Jin-Ju Kang, Na-Ri Lee, Sun-Young Oh |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
Psychology | 2 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,285,541
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,513
of 12,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,711
of 420,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#308
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.