The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human-Centric Lighting: Foundational Considerations and a Five-Step Design Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.630553 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin W. Houser, Tony Esposito |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 69 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 16% |
| Design | 13 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Energy | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 82 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,091,383
of 26,513,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#905
of 15,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,878
of 544,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#48
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,513,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 544,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.