The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intravitreal Gene Therapy vs. Natural History in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A ND4 Mutation: Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.662838 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy J. Newman, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Valerio Carelli, Valerie Biousse, Mark L. Moster, Catherine Vignal-Clermont, Robert C. Sergott, Thomas Klopstock, Alfredo A. Sadun, Jean-François Girmens, Chiara La Morgia, Adam A. DeBusk, Neringa Jurkute, Claudia Priglinger, Rustum Karanjia, Constant Josse, Julie Salzmann, François Montestruc, Michel Roux, Magali Taiel, José-Alain Sahel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#296,497
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#105
of 14,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,211
of 441,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#4
of 606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.