The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ARCA Registry: A Collaborative Global Platform for Advancing Trial Readiness in Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.677551 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Traschütz, Selina Reich, Astrid D. Adarmes, Mathieu Anheim, Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi, Jonathan Baets, A. Nazli Basak, Enrico Bertini, Bernard Brais, Cynthia Gagnon, Janina Gburek-Augustat, Hasmet A. Hanagasi, Anna Heinzmann, Rita Horvath, Peter de Jonghe, Christoph Kamm, Peter Klivenyi, Thomas Klopstock, Martina Minnerop, Alexander Münchau, Mathilde Renaud, Richard H. Roxburgh, Filippo M. Santorelli, Tommaso Schirinzi, Deborah A. Sival, Dagmar Timmann, Stefan Vielhaber, Michael Wallner, Bart P. van de Warrenburg, Ginevra Zanni, Stephan Zuchner, Thomas Klockgether, Rebecca Schüle, Ludger Schöls, PREPARE Consortium, Matthis Synofzik |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,649,361
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,918
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,059
of 443,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#118
of 644 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 644 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.