↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Different Components of Brain Oxygenation for the Assessment of Cerebral Haemodynamics: A Prospective Observational Study on COVID-19 Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Use of Different Components of Brain Oxygenation for the Assessment of Cerebral Haemodynamics: A Prospective Observational Study on COVID-19 Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2021.735469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Robba, Danilo Cardim, Lorenzo Ball, Denise Battaglini, Wojciech Dabrowski, Matteo Bassetti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Marek Czosnyka, Rafael Badenes, Paolo Pelosi, Basil Matta, The GeCovid group, Iole Brunetti, Maurizio Loconte, Fabio Tarantino, Marco Sottano, Francesco Marramao, Angelo Gratarola, Paolo Frisoni, Elena Ciaravolo, Chiara Dentone, Lucia Taramasso, Laura Magnasco, Antonio Vena, Gianluigi Zona, Pietro Fiaschi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,567,529
of 23,907,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,451
of 12,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,573
of 514,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#228
of 662 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,907,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 662 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.