↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing Safety in Epilepsy Surgery (EASINESS): Study Protocol for a Retrospective, Multicenter, Open Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing Safety in Epilepsy Surgery (EASINESS): Study Protocol for a Retrospective, Multicenter, Open Registry
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2021.782666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Drexler, Sharona Ben-Haim, Christian G. Bien, Valeri Borger, Francesco Cardinale, Alexandre Carpentier, Fernando Cendes, Sarat Chandra, Hans Clusmann, Albert Colon, Marco de Curtis, Daniel Delev, Giuseppe Didato, Lasse Dührsen, Jibril Osman Farah, Marc Guenot, Saadi Ghatan, Claire Haegelen, Hajo Hamer, Jason S. Hauptmann, Rosalind L. Jeffree, Thilo Kalbhenn, Josua Kegele, Niklaus Krayenbühl, Johannes Lang, Bertrand Mathon, Georgios Naros, Julia Onken, Fedor Panov, Christian Raftopoulos, Franz L. Ricklefs, Kim Rijkers, Michele Rizzi, Karl Rössler, Olaf Schijns, Ulf C. Schneider, Andrea Spyrantis, Adam Strzelczyk, Stefan Stodieck, Manjari Tripathi, Sumeet Vadera, Mario A. Alonso-Vanegas, José Géraldo Ribero Vaz, Jörg Wellmer, Tim Wehner, Manfred Westphal, Thomas Sauvigny

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 33%
Unspecified 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,834,028
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,104
of 11,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,918
of 499,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#225
of 670 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 670 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.