The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meditative-based diaphragmatic breathing vs. vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of fibromyalgia—A randomized controlled trial: Body vs. machine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2022.1030927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Ethan Paccione, Audun Stubhaug, Lien My Diep, Leiv Arne Rosseland, Henrik Børsting Jacobsen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,876,703
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,603
of 14,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,717
of 440,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#36
of 763 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 763 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.