↓ Skip to main content

Electroencephalogram (EEG) With or Without Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as Biomarkers for Post-stroke Recovery: A Narrative Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electroencephalogram (EEG) With or Without Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as Biomarkers for Post-stroke Recovery: A Narrative Review
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2022.827866
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zafer Keser, Samuel C. Buchl, Nathan A. Seven, Matej Markota, Heather M. Clark, David T. Jones, Giuseppe Lanzino, Robert D. Brown, Gregory A. Worrell, Brian N. Lundstrom

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 36 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Engineering 6 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,277,809
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,997
of 12,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,695
of 442,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#210
of 827 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 827 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.