↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Tap Test by Combining the Use of Functional Gait Assessment and Global Rating of Change

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Tap Test by Combining the Use of Functional Gait Assessment and Global Rating of Change
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2022.846429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahiro Kameda, Yoshinaga Kajimoto, Yasutaka Nikaido, Akihiro Kambara, Kohei Tsujino, Hironori Yamada, Fugen Takagi, Yusuke Fukuo, Takuya Kosaka, Takuya Kanemitsu, Yoshihide Katayama, Yuichiro Tsuji, Ryokichi Yagi, Ryo Hiramatsu, Naokado Ikeda, Naosuke Nonoguchi, Motomasa Furuse, Shinji Kawabata, Toshihiro Takami, Masahiko Wanibuchi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#20,826,372
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,235
of 12,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,300
of 441,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#469
of 790 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 790 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.