↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD)
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2022.868976
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jooyeon Jamie Im, Seunghee Na, Sanghoon Kang, Hyeonseok Jeong, Eek-Sung Lee, Tae-Kyeong Lee, Woo-Young Ahn, Yong-An Chung, In-Uk Song

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,146,485
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,283
of 12,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,707
of 442,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#335
of 772 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 772 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.