The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modified Interpretations of the Supine Roll Test in Horizontal Canal BPPV Based on Simulations: How the Initial Position of the Debris in the Canal and the Sequence of Testing Affects the Direction of the Nystagmus and the Diagnosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2022.881156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anita Bhandari, Rajneesh Bhandari, Herman Kingma, Michael Strupp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Chile | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,750,988
of 23,963,877 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,989
of 12,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,432
of 445,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#116
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,963,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.